Список литературы

dongu-vestnik05.ru

Вестник Донецкого университета. Серия 05. Филология и психология

Vestnik of Donetsk University. Series 05. Philology and Psychology

2616-8162

812

10.5281/zenodo.19908007

Articles

Статьи

Research Article

Contribution to group activities as type of employees’ civic behaviour in organization

Андриалович Е.С., Сидоренков А.В. Вклад в групповую активность как разновидность гражданского поведения сотрудников в организации

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4371-5650

Andrialovich

Ekaterina

Андриалович

Екатерина

esalnikova@sfedu.ru 1

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0554-3103

Sidorenkov

Andrey

Сидоренков

Андрей

avsidorenkov@sfedu.ru 2

Южный федеральный университет Southern Federal University

30 04 2026

NO2 (2026)

№2 (2026)

217 230 07 05 2026

2026

Вестник Донецкого университета. Серия 05. Филология и психология

Vestnik of Donetsk University. Series 05. Philology and Psychology

Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

https://dongu-vestnik05.ru/index.php/vestnik05/article/view/812

The paper deals with the contribution to group activities as a type of employees’ civic behaviour in an organization. This type of organizational civic behaviour focuses on the activities and development of the work group as a collective entity. The article defines group’s activity contribution and highlights its key attributes. A competent assessment of business and socio-psychological situations that are important for the group, timely and well-founded proposals, initiative and specific actions are group’s activity key characteristics. A comparative analysis was conducted, aiming at the contribution to group activity with terminologically similar constructs, as well as with some dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior that are directed at the group, division or the organization. This analysis has established distinctive features of group’s activity contribution that show it as an independent construct. In conclusion, some theoretical and practical implications are made, as well as some important issues for further research are addressed.

В работе анализируется вклад в групповую активность как разновидность гражданского поведения сотрудников организации. Данное поведение относится к типу гражданского поведения, ориентированного на деятельность и развитие производственной группы как коллективного субъекта. В статье дано определение вкладу в групповую активность и выделены его ключевые атрибуты: компетентностная оценка важных для группы деловых и социально-психологических ситуаций, своевременные и обоснованные предложения, инициатива и конкретные действия. Проведен сравнительный анализ вклада в групповую активность с терминологически созвучными конструктами, а также с некоторыми разновидностями гражданского поведения, которые направлены на группу, вторичное подразделение или организацию в целом. Этот анализ позволил обозначить отличительные особенности вклада в групповую активность, которые позволяют судить о нем как о самостоятельном конструкте. В завершении работы представлены теоретические и практические приложения, а также некоторые перспективы дальнейшего исследования.

work group organizational civic behaviour contribution to group activity competent assessment reasonable proposals initiative specific actions dimension of OCB

производственная группа организационное гражданское поведение вклад в групповую активность компетентностная оценка обоснованные предложения инициатива конкретные действия разновидности ОГП

[Полный текст статьи отсутствует в исходных данных. Необходимо добавить текст из PDF или другого источника.]

Список литературы

список литературы из-за копирования из пдф разрывается при вставке, объедини разрывы, ничего не меняя

СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

1. Бардовский В.П. Управление трудовым вкладом работника в общее дело организации как фактор повышения эффективности использования человеческих ресурсов / В.П. Бардовский, Н.В. Пьянова, А.П. Верижников // Фундаментальные исследования. — 2015. — № 2, Ч. 13. — С. 2876–2879.

2. Ильина О.Н. Проактивное рабочее поведение: концепции и направления исследований / О.Н. Ильина, Н.Н. Лепёхин, С.А. Маничев // Организационная психология. — 2022. — Т. 12, № 1. — С. 92–127. — DOI 10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-1-92-127.

3. Кабалина В.И. Вовлеченность работников: систематизация подходов к определению и измерению / В.И. Кабалина, А.В. Макарова // Организационная психология. — 2022. — Т. 12, № 3. — С. 110–137. — DOI 10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-3-110-137.

4. Орлова Л.В. Управление знаниями как ресурс повышения креативности организации / Л.В. Орлова, И.Н. Иванов, Г.М. Сундукова // Управление персоналом и интеллектуальными ресурсами в России. — 2022. — Т. 11, № 1 (58). — С. 47–50. — DOI 10.12737/2305-7807-2022-11-1-47-50.

5. Сидоренков А.В. Идентичность и вклад работников в деятельность малой производственной группы / А.В. Сидоренков, Е.С. Сальникова, В.А. Штроо // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. — 2019. — Т. 16, № 3. — С. 551–561. — DOI 10.17323/1813-8918-2019-3-551-561.

6. Сидоренков А.В. Идентичность, идентификация и гражданское поведение работников в организации : монография / А.В. Сидоренков. — Ростов-на-Дону: Мини Тайп, 2021. — 200 с.

7. Сидоренков А.В. Связь вклада сотрудников в групповую активность со сплоченностью и эффективностью малых групп в организации / А.В. Сидоренков // Вопросы психологии. — 2022. — Т. 68. № 5. — С. 75–84.

8. Эсаулова И.А. Мотивационный механизм инициативного поведения работника / И.А. Эсаулова // Управление персоналом и интеллектуальными ресурсами в России. — 2023. — Т. 12, № 4. — С. 48–53. — DOI 10.12737/2305-7807-2023-12-4-48-53.

9. Эсаулова И.А. Управление инициативой персонала как область деятельности современной организации / И.А. Эсаулова, И.В. Семенова // Вестник университета. — 2017. — № 9. — С. 26–34.

10. Alkahtani A. Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and rewards / A. Alkahtani // International Business Research. — 2015. — Vol. 8, No .4. — P. 210–222. — DOI 10.5539/ibr.v8n4p210.

11. Bateman T.S. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee «citizenship» / T.S. Bateman, D.W. Organ // Academy of Management Journal. — 1983. — Vol. 26, № 4. — Р. 587–595. — DOI 10.2307/255908.

12. Behfar K.J. Impact of Team (Dis)satisfaction and Psychological Safety on Performance Evaluation Biases / K.J. Behfar, R. Friedman, S.H. Oh // Small Group Research. — 2016. — Vol. 47(1). — P. 77–107. — DOI 10.1177/1046496415616865.

13. Bergeron D.M. Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen / D.M. Bergeron, A.J. Shipp, B. Rosen, S.A. Furst // Journal of Management. — 2013. — Vol. 39, No. 4. — P. 958–984. — DOI 10.1177/0149206311407508.

14. Bruque S. OCB and external-internal social networks: Effects on individual performance and adaptation to change / S. Bruque, J. Moyano, R. Piccolo // International Journal of Human Resource Management. — 2015. — Vol. 27, № 1. — Р. 1–22. — DOI 10.1080/09585192.2015.1020441.

15. Cogliser C.C. Big five personality factors and leader emergence in virtual teams: Relationships with team trustworthiness, member performance contributions, and team performance / C.C. Cogliser, W.L. Gardner, M.B. Gavin, J.C. Broberg // Group & Organization Management. — 2012. — Vol. 37, No. 6. — P. 752–784. — DOI 10.1177/1059601112464266.

16. Farh J.-L. Organizational citizenship behavior in the People’s Republic of China / J.-L. Farh, C. -B. Zhong,

D.W. Organ // Organization Science. — 2004. — Vol. 15, No. 2. — P. 133–257.

17. George J.M. Organizational spontaneity in context / J.M. George, G.R. Jones // Human Performance. — 1997. — Vol. 10. — Р. 153–170. — DOI 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_6.

18. Graham J.W. An essay on organizational citizenship behavior / J.W. Graham // Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. — 1991. — Vol. 4, No. 4. — P. 249–270.

19. Hapzi A. Pengukuran organizational citizenship behavior: Beban kerja, budaya kerja dan motivasi (Studi literature review) / A. Hapzi, S. Istianingsih, S. Farhan // Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin. — 2022. — Vol. 1, No. 1. — P. 83–93. — DOI 10.38035/jim.v1i1.16.

20. Kilduff G.J. Hierarchy and its discontents: Status disagreement leads to withdrawal of contribution and lower group performance / G.J. Kilduff, R. Willer, C. Anderson // Organization Science. — 2016. — Vol. 27, No. 2. — P. 373–390. — DOI 10.1287/orsc.2016.1058.

21. LePine J.A. Predicting voice behavior in work groups / J.A. LePine, L. Van Dyne // Journal of Applied Psychology. — 1998. — Vol. 83, № 6. — Р. 853–868. — DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853.

22. Mandira D. Organizational citizenship behavior: A step towards effective employee engagement in the banking sector / D. Mandira // Organizational Psychology. — 2023. — Vol. 13, No. 2. — P. 53–63. — DOI 10.17323/2312-5942-2023-13-2-53-63.

23. Maynes T.D. Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors / T.D. Maynes, P.M. Podsakoff // Journal of Applied Psychology. — 2014. — Vol. 99, No. 1. — P. 87–112. — DOI 10.1037/a0034284.

24. Moorman R.H. Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior / R.H. Moorman, G.L. Blakely // Journal of Organizational Behavior. — 1995. — Vol. 16, № 2. — Р. 127–142. — DOI 10.1002/job.4030160204.

25. Neves P.C. Organizational citizenship behavior in schools: Validation of a questionnaire / P.C. Neves, R. Paixão, M. Alarcão, A.D. Gomes // The Spanish Journal of Psychology. — 2014. — Vol. 17. — Р. 1–24. — DOI 10.1017/sjp.2014.20.

26. Organ D.W. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents and consequences / D.W. Organ, Ph.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie. — Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2006. — 360 р.

27. Organ D.W. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome / D.W. Organ. — Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1988. — 132 р.

28. Organ D.W. The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior / D.W. Organ // Research in organizational behavior / Eds. B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings. — Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990. — Vol. 12. — Р. 43–72.

29. Ozer M.A. Moderated mediation model of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance / M.A. Ozer // Journal of Applied Psychology. — 2011. — Vol. 96, № 6. — Р. 1328–1336. — DOI 10.1037/a0023644.

30. Podsakoff N.P. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis / N.P. Podsakoff, S.W. Whiting, Ph.M. Podsakoff, B.D. Blume // Journal of Applied Psychology. — 2009. — Vol. 94, № 1. — P. 122–141. — DOI 10.1037/a0013079.

31. Podsakoff Ph.M. Organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review of theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research / Ph.M. Podsakoff, S.B. MacKenzie, J.B. Paine, D.G. Bachrach // Journal of Management. — 2000. — Vol. 26, № 3. — Р. 513–563. – DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00047-7.

32. Purwanto A. Effect of transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and organizational commitments on organizational citizenship behavior / A. Purwanto, J.T. Purba, I. Bernarto, R. Sijabat // INOBIS Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis. — 2021. — Vol. 9. — P. 61–69. — DOI 10.35314/inovbiz.v9i1.1801.

33. Sidorenkov A.V. Associations of employees’ identification and citizenship behavior in organization: A systematic review and a meta-analysis / A.V. Sidorenkov, E.F. Borokhovski, D.V. Vorontsov // Management Review Quarterly — 2023. — Vol. 73(2). — P. 695–729. — DOI 10.1007/s11301-022-00258-9.

34. Sidorenkov A.V. Dimensions of identification in the workgroup and employees’ contributions to collaborative activities / A.V. Sidorenkov, E.S. Salnikova, D.S. Vorontsov, A.A. Klimov // SAGE Open. — 2020. — Vol. 10, No. 4. — P. 1–14. — DOI 10.1177/2158244020976385.

35. Stevens M.J. The knowledge, skill and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management / M.J. Stevens, M.A. Campion // Journal of Management. — 1994. — Vol. 20. — P. 503–530.

36. Van Dyne L. Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (A bridge over muddied waters) / L. Van Dyne, L.L. Cummings, J.M. Parks // Research in organizational behavior / Eds. L.L. Cummings, B.M. Staw. — Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1995. — Vol. 17. — Р. 215–285.

37. Van Dyne L. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity / L. Van Dyne, J.A. LePine // Academy of Management Journal. — 1998. — Vol. 41, № 1. — Р. 108–119. — DOI 10.2307/256902.

38. Willer R. Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem / R. Willer // American Sociological Review. — 2009. — Vol. 74. — P. 23–43.

39. Williams L.J. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors / L.J. Williams, S.E. Anderson // Journal of Management. — 1991. — Vol. 17, № 3. — P. 601– 617. — DOI 10.1177/0972262912483529.

REFERENCES

1. Bardovskij V.P., Pʹyanova N.V., & Verizhnikov A.P. (2015). Upravlenie trudovym vkladom rabotnika v obshchee delo organizatsii kak faktor povysheniya effektivnosti ispolʹzovaniya chelovecheskikh resursov [Managing an employee’s contribution to the organization’s common cause as a factor in enhancing human resource efficiency]. Fundamentalʹnye issledovaniya, 2(13), 2876–2879 (In Russian).

2. Ilyina O.N., Lepekhin N.N., Manichev S.A. (2022). Proaktivnoe rabochee povedenie: kontseptsii i napravleniya issledovanij [Proactive work behaviour: a review of the concepts and research directions]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational Psychology], 12(1), 92–127. DOI 10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-1-92-127 (In Russian).

3. Kabalina V.I., Makarova A.V. (2022). Vovlechennostʹ rabotnikov: sistematizatsiya podkhodov k opredeleniyui izmereniyu [Employee engagement: systematization of approaches to the definition and measurement]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational Psychology], 12(3), 110–137. DOI 10.17323/2312-5942-2022-12-3-110-137 (In Russian).

4. Orlova L.V., Ivanov I.N., Sundukova G.M. (2022). Upravlenie znaniyami kak resurs povysheniya kreativnosti organizatsii [Knowledge management as a resource for increasing the creativity of an organization]. Upravlenie personalom i intellektualʹnymi resursami v Rossii [Human resources and Intellectual Resources Management in Russia], 11 (1/58), 47–50. DOI 10.12737/2305-7807-2022-11-1-47-50 (In Russian).

5. Sidorenkov A.V., Salnikova E.S., Stroh V.A. (2019). Identichnostʹ i vklad rabotnikov v deyatelʹnostʹ maloj proizvodstvennoj gruppy [The Identity and Contribution of Employees as Relating to the Activities of a Small Work Group]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 16(3), 551–561. DOI 10.17323/1813-8918-2019-3-551-561 (In Russian).

6. Sidorenkov A.V. (2021). Identichnostʹ, identifikatsiya i grazhdanskoe povedenie rabotnikov v organizatsii: monografiya [Identity, identification, and civic behavior of employees in an organization] Rostov-on-Don: Mini Taip (In Russian).

7. Sidorenkov A.V. (2022). Svyaz’ vklada sotrudnikov v gruppovuyu aktivnost’ so splochennost’yu i effektivnost’yu malykh grupp v organizatsii [Communication of employеes’ contribution to the group activity with cohesion and the effectiveness of small groups in the organization]. Voprosy psikhologii, 68(5), 75–84 (In Russian).

8. Esaulova I.A. (2023). Motivatsionnyj mekhanizm initsiativnogo povedeniya rabotnika [Motivational mechanism of employee's initiative behavior]. Upravlenie personalom i intellektualʹnymi resursami v Rossii, 12(4), 48–53. DOI 10.12737/2305-7807-2023-12-4-48-53 (In Russian).

9. Esaulova I.A., Semenova I.V. (2017). Upravlenie initsiativoj personala kak oblastʹ deyatelʹnosti sovremennoj organizatsii [Management of personnel initiative as the as the activities of the modern organization]. Vestnik universiteta, 9, 26–34 (In Russian).

10. Alkahtani A. (2015). Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and rewards. International Business Research, 8(4), 210–222. DOI 10.5539/ibr.v8n4p210 (In English).

11. Bateman T.S., & Organ D.W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee «citizenship». Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587–595. DOI 10.2307/255908 (In English).

12. Behfar K.J., Friedman R., & Oh S.H. (2016). Impact of team (dis)satisfaction and psychological safety on performance evaluation biases. Small Group Research, 47(1), 77–107. DOI 10.1177/1046496415616865 (In English).

13. Bergeron D.M., Shipp A.J., Rosen B., & Furst S.A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39(4), 958–984. DOI 10.1177/0149206311407508 (In English).

14. Bruque S., Moyano J., & Piccolo R. (2015). OCB and external-internal social networks: Effects on individual performance and adaptation to change. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(1), 1–22. DOI 10.1080/09585192.2015.1020441 (In English).

15. Cogliser C.C., Gardner W.L., Gavin M.B., & Broberg J.C. (2012). Big five personality factors and leader emergence in virtual teams: Relationships with team trustworthiness, member performance contributions, and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 752–784. DOI 10.1177/1059601112464266 (In English).

16. Farh J.-L., Zhong C.-B., & Organ D.W. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2), 133–257 (In English).

17. George J.M., & Jones G.R. (1997). Organizational spontaneity in context. Human Performance, 10, 153–170. DOI 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_6 (In English).

18. Graham J.W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4(4), 249–270 (In English).

19. Hapzi A., Istianingsih S., & Farhan S. (2022). Pengukuran organizational citizenship behavior: Beban kerja, budaya kerja dan motivasi (Studi literature review). Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin, 1(1), 83–93. DOI 10.38035/jim.v1i1.16 (In English).

20. Kilduff G.J., Willer R., & Anderson C. (2016). Hierarchy and its discontents: Status disagreement leads to withdrawal of contribution and lower group performance. Organization Science, 27(2), 373–390. DOI 10.1287/orsc.2016.1058 (In English).

21. LePine J.A., & Van Dyne L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853–868. DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853 (In English).

22. Mandira D. (2023). Organizational citizenship behavior: A step towards effective employee engagement in the banking sector. Organizational Psychology, 13(2), 53–63. DOI 10.17323/2312-5942-2023-13-2-53-63 (In English).

23. Maynes T.D., & Podsakoff P.M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 87–112. DOI 10.1037/a0034284 (In English).

24. Moorman R.H., & Blakely G.L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 127–142. DOI 10.1002/job.4030160204 (In English).

25. Neves P.C., Paixão R., Alarcão M., & Gomes A.D. (2014). Organizational citizenship behavior in schools: Validation of a questionnaire. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1–24. DOI 10.1017/sjp.2014.20 (In English).

26. Organ D.W., Podsakoff Ph.M., & MacKenzie S.B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications (In English).

27. Organ D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books (In English).

28. Organ D.W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in organizational behavior / Eds. B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 12, 43–72 (In English).

29. Ozer M.A. (2011). Moderated mediation model of the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1328–1336. DOI 10.1037/a0023644 (In English).

30. Podsakoff N.P., Whiting S.W., Podsakoff Ph.M., & Blume B.D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141. DOI 10.1037/a0013079 (In English).

31. Podsakoff Ph.M., MacKenzie S.B., Paine J.B., & Bachrach D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. DOI 10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00047-7 (In English).

32. Purwanto A., Purba J.T., Bernarto I., & Sijabat R. (2021). Effect of transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and organizational commitments on organizational citizenship behavior. INOBIS Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis, 9, 61–69. DOI 10.35314/inovbiz.v9i1.1801 (In English).

33. Sidorenkov A.V., Borokhovski E.F., & Vorontsov D.V. (2023). Associations of employees’ identification and citizenship behavior in organization: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 73(2), 695–729. DOI 10.1007/s11301-022-00258-9 (In English).

34. Sidorenkov A.V., Salnikova E.S., Vorontsov D.V., & Klimov A.A. (2020). Dimensions of identification in the workgroup and employees’ contributions to collaborative activities. SAGE Open, 10(4), 1–14. DOI 10.1177/2158244020976385 (In English).

35. Stevens M. J., & Campion M.A. (1994). The knowledge, skill and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20, 503–530 (In English).

36. Van Dyne L., Cummings L.L., & Parks J.M. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (A bridge over muddied waters). Research in organizational behavior / Eds. L.L. Cummings, B.M. Staw. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 17, 215–285 (In English).

37. Van Dyne L., & LePine J.A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. DOI 10.2307/256902 (In English).

38. Willer R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74, 23–43 (In English).

39. Williams L.J., & Anderson S.E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. DOI 10.1177/0972262912483529 (In English).